{Book Club: The Spirit of the Liturgy}
- I hope you will read along in this book club (or just read my posts, that’s okay): Joseph Ratzinger’s The Spirit of the Liturgy.
- (When you buy something via our Amazon affiliate link, a little cash rolls our way… just a little. Thanks!)
- I’ll post on Fridays, although for this longer book, perhaps not every Friday. I’ll give you your homework, I’ll talk about what we read, we’ll discuss in the comments. Even if you read later, the comments will still be open.
Last time: Apostasy or Worship?
Homework: Read Chapter Three of Part I.
Chapter Two, Part I: Liturgy — Cosmos — History
In the previous chapter we read about how God intervened in history to make clear what He wanted worship to be, both exteriorly and interiorly — the rules for worship and also for the interior disposition of those who worship: To go to a certain place but also to be different there by living a certain way.
The interesting question arises of how worship looks elsewhere. It seems that man always has the idea that the gods sustain the world, so he attempts to offer them propitiation for what seems to be their preoccupation with willfully ignoring, taunting, or harming humanity.
But in a funny way, this kind of worship leads to the sense of having power over the gods! Frighteningly, this power further affirms man's suspicion that he can destroy himself. By the way, I find this a deep insight, kind of tossed off the way Ratzinger does, then coming back to sneak up on you and hit you hard: MAN IS SUFFERING FROM EXISTENTIAL ANXIETY. All because he was anxious to start with and got an anxiety ball rolling.
Anyway.
The Sabbath, God's first covenant with man, offers freedom. Creation and covenant occur together: if creation as we can see becomes “the space for the covenant, the place where God and man meet one another… then it must be thought of as a space for worship.”
And thus we can see that it's a mistake to misunderstand freedom and think of the Sabbath as “a pure vision of a liberated society as the goal of human history,” taken apart from creation itself. So very often if we disconnect the vision from the place, we end up with a sort of idealization that is ever receding into the future.
So how to understand this tension, the tension between worship as ideal and existing in the realm of the unseen, as well as the undeniable fact that it is rooted in creation — that creation is not some sort of receptacle to be tossed away, but has meaning in itself for salvation?
Actually, the whole of the rest of the book is going to be an answer to this question. Because it is the question! Somehow, true worship must take into account everything, and reconcile it all.
Step by step, we will get there…
I love the paragraph, beginning on the bottom of page 26, to support this thesis of the unity of cosmos and history in God's plan. It has to do with the giving of the ceremonial law in Exodus:
Seven times it says, “Moses did as the Lord had commanded him,” words that suggest that the seven-day work on the tabernacle replicates the seven-day work on creation. The account of the construction of the tabernacle ends with a kind of vision of the Sabbath. “So Moses finished the work. Then the cloud covered the tent of meeting, and the glory of the LORD filled the tabernacle.” (Ex 40:33f.) The completion of the tent anticipates the completion of creation. God makes his dwelling in the world. Heaven and earth are united. In this connection we should add that, in the Old Testament, the verb bara has two, and only two, meanings. First, it denotes the process of the world's creation, the separation of the elements, through which the cosmos emerges out of chaos. Secondly, it denotes the fundamental process of salvation history, that is, the election, and separation of pure from impure, and therefore the inauguration of the history of God's dealings with men. Thus begins the spiritual creation, the creation of the covenant, without which the created cosmos would be an empty shell. Creation and history, creation, history, and worship are in a relationship of reciprocity. Creation looks toward the covenant, but the covenant completes creation and does not simply exist along with it. Now if worship, rightly understood, is the soul of the covenant, then it not only saves mankind but is also meant to draw the whole of reality into communion with God.” [my emphasis]
The next couple of pages, 28-30, are very interesting for trying to express cosmos and history in terms of some sort of diagram. Is time an arrow, as Teilhard de Chardin would have us think? Is Jesus an “energy”? Is the future some sort of synthesis? (Spoiler: T. de C. is always going to make us feel pretty good while we read him, but is, as Jeeves would say, “fundamentally unsound, sir.”)
Rather than the arrow, Ratzinger reminds us of the cross… and then the circle. Neither the arrow nor the circle quite capture the Christian idea of how to think about reality, although each contains some element at least of experience; but it should come as no surprise that the cross is a better image!
If you are wondering about exitus and reditus (going and coming or returning), obviously Ratzinger has a lot to say about this motion — leaving and entering, falling and redemption. We are not going to get sidetracked into that, but we are just going to realize that everything — creation, history (especially as depicted in the Bible), and each person's experience — is just this: coming from God, and going to Him. Our end is with Him. Also: He comes to us, in order to make this “return/reditus” possible.
Knowing this means that we can also know that sacrifice — that one factor common to all religions — does not mean destruction. A bit later in the chapter, Ratzinger tells us that the cross of Christ demonstrates that in dying, He makes us a gift of Himself, which of course “has nothing to do with destruction.”
Back to the diagram. Two things I want to throw out there for your delectation, figure-of-the-cross-wise, related to exitus/reditus and the cosmos:
First, when viewed from earth, even though we speak of the stars as circling in the sky, we observe a “cross-shaped movement” in the planets' occasional retrograde motion.
Second, that cross made by the stars (planets) reminded me of a time that Suki and I heard a Bach scholar performing and speaking about the Prelude and Fugue in C-sharp minor (BWV 849). I don't have the time or space to delve in the significance of this work, but will merely point out that it too contains a “cross” motif (which also happens to be the “Bach motif” — the melody formed by the letters of his name) — undoubtedly meant to represent and actually present to the listener the image (or sound!) of Christ's cross. You can read a little about the cross motif here, and give a listen. There's another discussion (relating to a different Bach piece) here (scroll down).
My only point here being that actual things in the universe — natural things like the planets and artistic things like music — almost fling the cross at us, just when we think we've figured out the pattern.
I also want to plug my very own image or motif for how to represent the reality of worship, avoiding the closed-in-ness of the circle or the unreality of the arrow, and that is the spiral. In our book, The Little Oratory, David Clayton and I discuss how fitting the spiral is to imagine the Liturgical Year (which, as Pius XII says, is the way for us to encounter Jesus Christ). Each turn of the spiral returns to something that has gone before, but the whole is ascending to the heights of Heaven and our ultimate home.
But the spiral is only a good image if it's grounded in the reality of the turning of the year, the cosmos, and the knowing of the past, history. Otherwise, it becomes an ascent that the “knowers” embrace, leaving the “simple ones” behind, and this is Gnosticism.
“In early Christianity, the clash with Gnosticism was the decisive struggle with its own identity.” This is an easy line to miss (because it's near the bottom of p. 31), but it's an important one. Gnosticism is the error that's the easiest to fall into, the one that seems “most identifiable” with the Christian message. But you'll know it by how it hates, precisely, matter and creation.
But here comes the Good Shepherd, to rescue the sheep from the thicket. Again, just as we get worked up trying to figure religion out and make it all work as it ought, Ratzinger cuts through with not only an image from the Bible, but the one image most appealing to the childlike in us (as opposed to that sophisticated philosopher strenuously attempting to get up to the heights on his own, that Gnostic!). “The shepherd who rescues him and takes him home is the Logos himself, the eternal Word, the eternal Meaning of the universe dwelling in the Son… Man is given a homecoming.”
“The circles of the cosmos and of history are now distinguished” in the Paschal participation. “The gift of freedom is the center of created as well as of divine being, and so the historical element has its own irrevocable meaning, but it is not for that reason separated from the cosmic element.” Christianity is new, but it “does not spurn” the old.
Thus it restores creation to its true identity.
Do share with us what you think of this chapter! I look forward to your comments!
Click here to see our previous discussion of Romano Guardini’s The Spirit of the Liturgy, which you can read free, online. You can also purchase it here, although be warned, this edition does not have the footnotes, which stinks.
Kathia says
“that creation is not some sort of receptacle to be tossed away, but has meaning in itself for salvation…”
YES! Thank you!
“Now if worship, rightly understood, is the soul of the covenant, then it not only saves mankind but is also meant to draw the whole of reality into communion with God.”
Beautiful!! Romans 8:20-23!
Words cannot express how much I loved this post.
Kathia says
This also reminds me of string theory and God particles and the Word of God (Logos/Jesus) being at the heart of all of creation. I was trying to find a good source for this thought process on the internet but couldn’t. However, I recall hearing the chirps of a cricket recorded and slowed down tremendously (how other crickets “hear” them) and how remarkably like a Bach symphony they sounded!! As the Psalms say, all of creation praises God by calling back to Him the Word they have been given. The great composers merely tapped into a Greater Truth.
corina says
This chapter was a bit difficult for me, it has so many important ideas packed in several pages. There are two things that captured my attention:
1) The Sabbath as a vision of liberty and equality, a day in which all the subordination relationships are cancelled and the strain of work stops for a moment. Our modern world is totally not on board with this vision. We seem to be trapped in a social organisation that makes living the Sunday as a day of rest really challenging. While reading this chapter in Ratzinger’s book I happened to also read another book about Jewish customs and cuisine and how they organize the Sabbath dinner: because of the various labor restrictions all the hot food is prepared ahead of time. I really thought they were probably on to something with this, as in this way the woman could really rest on the feast day. Speaking of the collective memory, I tink this was something that was known and followed in the Christian culture across Europe: I remember that my grandmother used to prepare on Saturday the labor intensive items of the Sunday lunch in order to be free to attend Church on Sunday morning (which was long in the Byzantine rite). She also didn’t sew, clean or wash on Sunday and probably this comes also from the collective memory of the Old Testament. I used to think they were rigid and formal prescriptions, but now I understand that they probably protected the woman’s ability to really rest on Sunday.
2) The other idea I want to point out is that of sacrifice that does not mean destruction, but reunification of man and creation with God. Our main conflict, the one that makes us suffer of existential anxiety (as you pointed out) consists in not accepting our complete dependence on God, in the way the little baby depends on the mother. Our idea of autonomy is an obstacle between us and God. And I believe that many of us who had a modern education must be cured precisely of this erroneous concept of autonomy.
Kathia says
(I’m a little bit embarrassed to comment as I haven’t been able to keep up with the readings, but this section really struck a chord with me, and I think Leila said something about participating in the posts even if we haven’t been able to read the chapter, so…)
Corina, I really like what you had to say about autonomy. Deep down I know this is true, that autonomy keeps us from full relationship with our Maker, but oh how society and inner fears make it hard to live in complete surrender! I long for this surrender and deep relationship (mirrored in the marriage relationship), but as you say, there is a lot of faulty teaching that has to be dealt with before this surrender can be reality. I am only now getting it… that proper liturgy is God’s way of taking my hand and guiding me into the full truth of that surrender! When I first came into the Church, the liturgy seemed so un-moving compared to what I had experienced in non-denom. church settings. I couldn’t figure out how this was what God wanted as worship of Him! But, on a date with my husband the other night, I *got* it! In the course of our conversation, we rejoiced that our relationship had weathered so many storms and was true and deep; we were fully committed to the other’s spiritual and physical good. That happened over many years of “un-moving” hard work raising our family together… all the redundant little things that show our love even when we don’t “feel” it (diaper changing comes to mind). So much different than infatuation, crush-love, which is chock full of feeling but no substance. Liturgy is the daily substantial showing of love and commitment to a relationship with God! I will learn surrender to Him through His liturgy even as I learned surrender to my spouse through the liturgy of our life together!
Oh, and YES our society makes it SO hard to live the Sabbath. Funny how our nation claims to be fighting for “equality” but misses this beautiful point you made: Sabbath brings it.